The accused were booked under IPC sections 295A (hurting religious sentiments), 447 (criminal trespass), 505 (public mischief), 506 (criminal intimidation), 34 (common intention), and other relevant sections.
The Case was Registered Under these Sections
The accused were booked under IPC sections 295A (hurting religious sentiments), 447 (criminal trespass), 505 (public mischief), 506 (criminal intimidation), 34 (common intention), and other relevant sections. The bench also noted that the complainant had stated that Hindus and Muslims lived in harmony in the area and that the slogan ‘Jai Shri Ram’ could lead to communal tension.
‘Hindus and Muslims Lived in Harmony’
The bench observed that the complainant had himself stated that Hindus and Muslims lived in harmony in the area. The bench ruled that allowing the proceedings to continue against the accused would be an abuse of the process of law. The bench cited a Supreme Court order, stating that no act would be considered an offense under IPC section 295A.
What was the Case?
The police had alleged that the accused had entered the mosque on September 24, 2023, around 10:50 pm, and shouted ‘Jai Shri Ram’ slogans. They were also accused of threatening others. When the complaint was filed, the accused were shown as unknown persons, and later, they were taken into custody. However, the accused challenged the charges against them and filed an appeal in the Karnataka High Court, which quashed the case against them.